TY - JOUR AU - Hoffmann, Rasmus AU - Doblhammer, Gabriele PY - 2021/04/29 Y2 - 2024/03/28 TI - Approaches and Methods for Causal Analysis of Panel Data in the Area of Morbidity and Mortality JF - Comparative Population Studies JA - CPoS VL - 46 IS - SE - Research Articles DO - 10.12765/CPoS-2021-03 UR - https://www.comparativepopulationstudies.de/index.php/CPoS/article/view/428 SP - AB - <p>We aim to give an overview of the state of the art of causal analysis of demographic issues related to morbidity and mortality. We will systematically introduce strategies to identify causal mechanisms, which are inherently linked to panel data from observational surveys and population registers. We will focus on health and mortality, and on the issues of unobserved heterogeneity and reverse causation between health and (1) retirement, (2) socio-economic status, and (3) characteristics of partnership and fertility history.</p><p>The boundaries between demographic research on mortality and morbidity and the neighbouring disciplines epidemiology, public health and economy are often blurred. We will highlight the specific contribution of demography by reviewing methods used in the demographic literature. We classify these methods according to important criteria, such as a design-based versus model-based approach and control for unobserved confounders. We present examples from the literature for each of the methods and discuss the assumptions and the advantages and disadvantages of the methods for the identification of causal effects in demographic morbidity and mortality research.</p><p>The differentiation between methods that control for unobserved confounders and those that do not reveal a fundamental difference between (1) methods that try to emulate a randomised experiment and have higher internal validity and (2) methods that attempt to achieve conditional independence by including all relevant factors in the model. The latter usually have higher external validity and require more assumptions and prior knowledge of relevant factors and their relationships. It is impossible to provide a general definition of the sort of validity that is more important, as there is always a trade-off between generalising the results to the population of interest and avoiding biases in the estimation of causal effects in the sample. We hope that our review will aid researchers in identifying strategies to answer their specific research question.</p><p>*&nbsp; This article belongs to a special issue on "Identification of causal mechanisms in demographic research: The contribution of panel data".</p> ER -