Misleading Policy Messages Derived from the Period TFR: Should We Stop Using It?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2010-15Keywords:
Fertility measurement, Total fertility, Policies, Fertility intentions, Fertility timing, Tempo effectAbstract
Discussions about fertility in developed countries refer almost exclusively to the period Total Fertility Rate (TFR). We argue that the use of this indicator frequently leads to incorrect interpretations of period fertility levels and trends, resulting in distorted policy conclusions and, potentially, in misguided policies. We illustrate this with four policy-relevant examples, drawn from contemporary Europe. These illustrations show that the TFR (a) inflates the presumed gap between fertility intentions and realised fertility, (b) erroneously suggests a significant fertility increase in many countries of Europe after the year 2000, (c) often exaggerates the level of immigrants’ fertility and (d) frequently suggests that family-related policies which led to shorter birth spacing in fact brought an upward swing in fertility level. There seems to be no policy-relevant question for which the period TFR would be the indicator of choice to be preferred over other existing measures.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Comparative Population StudiesComparative Population Studies erscheint open access (ab Jahrgang 2016 Creative Commons BY-SA), für Autoren, Leser und Bibliotheken kostenlos. Alle Rechte für die Jahrgänge 2015 und früher liegen beim Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung. Autoren erhalten für Beiträge dieser Jahrgänge die Rechte für eine erneute Publikation oder einen Nachdruck des Artikels oder Teilen davon, sofern die ursprüngliche Publikation in CPoS korrekt nachgewiesen wird. In solchen Fällen muss ein Sonderdruck oder eine Quellenangabe an CPoS abgeliefert werden.